Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Julien Cagnina Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Cagnina analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Julien Cagnina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilkel 2 - 0 Cagnina
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.71% of points on his second serve, while Cagnina has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cagnina has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cagnina has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Cagnina winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Cagnina has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 195/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 27/ 26).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19), where as Cagnina has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 4 and Cagnina winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Cagnina was at the Potchefstroom 2 Challenger, 16-02-2021, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-1 7-6(1).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Cagnina have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Cagnina 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 1, and Cagnina 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.26 while Cagnina has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cagnina has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 40.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cagnina has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
412
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
239
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
56% (401-313)
Career Total W/L
67% (275-135)
39% (9-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Julien Cagnina |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:13 | 1:23:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (72/122) | 54% (79/145) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (58/72) | 58% (46/79) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (25/50) | 45% (30/66) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (7/21) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (69/145) | 32% (39/122) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(1) |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Julien Cagnina
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
4
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Julien Cagnina
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
42%
(
20 of
48)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Julien Cagnina |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (9/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 39% (20/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (208/257) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.5 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 113 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.04 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (805/1413) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (566/805) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (284/608) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (38/94) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (479/1345) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (8/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Julien Cagnina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Julien Cagnina
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
96
|
0-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Julien Cagnina
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
59)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Julien Cagnina
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Julien Cagnina
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
49
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Julien Cagnina
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julien Cagnina
Player
Mischa Zverev
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Julien Cagnina
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 10-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Julien Cagnina
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 3-6 10-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Ilkel Vs Cagnina Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
